Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Client-Initiated Content-Encoding

In HTTP, "Content Codings" allow for payload encodings such as for compression or integrity checks. In particular, the "gzip" content coding is widely used for payload data sent in response messages.¶

Content Codings can be used in request messages as well, however discoverability is not on par with response messages. This document extends the HTTP "Accept-Encoding" header field for use in responses.¶

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress”.¶

This Internet-Draft will expire on November 11, 2014.¶

Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.¶

In HTTP, "Content Codings" allow for payload encodings such as for compression or integrity checks ([HTTPSEM], Section 3.1.2). In particular, the "gzip" content coding is widely used for payload data sent in response messages.¶

Content Codings can be used in request messages as well, however discoverability is not on par with response messages. This document extends the HTTP "Accept-Encoding" header field ([HTTPSEM], Section 5.3.4) for use in responses.¶

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].¶

This document reuses terminology used in the base HTTP specifications, namely Section 2 of [HTTPMSG] and Section 3.1.2 of [HTTPSEM].¶

Section 5.3.4 of [HTTPSEM] defines "Accept-Encoding" as a request header field only.¶

This specification extends that definition to allow "Accept-Encoding" as response header field as well. When present, it indicates what content codings a server is willing to accept in requests. In particular, a field value that contains "identity" only implies that no content codings are supported at all.¶

Note that this information applies to the resource to which the request was addressed. The set of supported encodings might vary for different resources on the same server, and could also vary depending on other aspects of the request (such as the request method).¶

Section 6.5.13 of [HTTPSEM] defines status code 415 (Unsupported Media Type) to apply to both media type and content coding related problems.¶

Servers that fail a request due to an unsupported content coding SHOULD respond with a 415 status and SHOULD include an "Accept-Encoding" header in that response, allowing clients to distinguish between content coding related issues and media type related issues.¶

...at which point the client can retry the request with the supported "gzip" content coding.¶

This specification does not introduce any new security considerations beyond those discussed in Section 9 of [HTTPSEM].¶

HTTP header fields are registered within the "Message Headers" registry located at <http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers>, as defined by [BCP90].¶