| QUIC Working Group | B. Trammell, Editor |
| Internet-Draft | M. Kuehlewind |
| Intended status: Experimental | ETH Zurich |
| Expires: April 26, 2019 | October 23, 2018 |
This document specifies the addition of a latency spin bit to the QUIC transport protocol and describes how to use it to measure end-to-end latency.¶
This document specifies an experimental delta to the QUIC transport protocol. Specifically, this experimentation is intended to determine:¶
The information generated by this experiment will be used by the QUIC working group as input to a decision about the standardization of the latency spin bit. Although this is a Working Group document, it is currently NOT a Working Group deliverable.¶
Discussion of this draft takes place on the QUIC working group mailing list (quic@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=quic.¶
Working Group information can be found at https://github.com/quicwg; source code and issues list for this draft can be found at https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/labels/-spin.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress”.¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 26, 2019.¶
Copyright © 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.¶
The QUIC transport protocol [QUIC-TRANSPORT] uses Transport Layer Security (TLS) [TLS] to encrypt most of its protocol internals. In contrast to TCP where the sequence and acknowledgement numbers and timestamps (if the respective option is in use) can be seen by on-path observers and used to estimate end-to-end latency, QUIC’s wire image (see [WIRE-IMAGE]) currently does not expose any information that can be used for passive latency measurement techniques that rely on this information (e.g. [CACM-TCP], [TMA-QOF]).¶
This document adds an explicit signal for passive latency measurability to the QUIC short header: a “spin bit”. Passive observation of the spin bit provides one RTT sample per RTT to passive observers of QUIC traffic. This document describes the mechanism, how it can be added to QUIC, and how it can be used by passive measurement facilities to generate RTT samples.¶
The latency spin bit enables latency monitoring from observation points on the network path throughout the duration of a connection. Since it is possible to measure handshake RTT without a spin bit, it is sufficient to include the spin bit in the short packet header. The spin bit therefore appears only after version negotiation and connection establishment are completed.¶
As of the current editor’s version of [QUIC-TRANSPORT], this proposal specifies using the sixth most significant bit (0x04) of the first octet in the short header for the spin bit.¶
0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |0|K|1|1|0|S|R R| +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Destination Connection ID (0..144) ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Packet Number (8/16/32) ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Protected Payload (*) ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: Short Header Format including proposed Spin Bit
S: The Spin bit is set 0 or 1 depending on the stored spin value that is updated on packet reception as explained in Section 2.2.¶
R: Two additional bits are reserved for experimentation in the short header.¶
Each endpoint, client and server, maintains a spin value, 0 or 1, for each QUIC connection, and sets the spin bit in the short header to the currently stored value when a packet with a short header is sent out. The spin value is initialized to 0 at each endpoint, client and server, at connection start. Each endpoint also remembers the highest packet number seen from its peer on the connection.¶
The spin value is then determined at each endpoint within a single connection as follows:¶
This procedure will cause the spin bit to change value in each direction once per round trip. Observation points can estimate the network latency by observing these changes in the latency spin bit, as described in Section 3. See [QUIC-SPIN] for further illustration of this mechanism in action.¶
Each client and server resets it spin value to zero when sending the first packet of a given connection with a new connection ID. This reduces the risk that transient spin bit state can be used to link flows across connection migration or ID change.¶
When a QUIC flow sends data continuously, the latency spin bit in each direction changes value once per round-trip time (RTT). An on-path observer can observe the time difference between edges (changes from 1 to 0 or 0 to 1) in the spin bit signal in a single direction to measure one sample of end-to-end RTT.¶
An observer can store the largest observed packet number per flow, and reject edges that do not have a monotonically increasing packet number (greater than the largest observed packet number). This will avoid detecting spurious edges caused by reordering events that include an edge, which would lead to very low RTT estimates if not ignored.¶
If the spin bit edge occurs after a long packet number gap, it should be ignored: this filters out high RTT estimates due to loss of an actual edge in a burst of lost packets.¶
Note that this measurement, as with passive RTT measurement for TCP, includes any transport protocol delay (e.g., delayed sending of acknowledgements) and/or application layer delay (e.g., waiting for a request to complete). It therefore provides devices on path a good instantaneous estimate of the RTT as experienced by the application. A simple linear smoothing or moving minimum filter can be applied to the stream of RTT information to get a more stable estimate.¶
However, application-limited and flow-control-limited senders can have application and transport layer delay, respectively, that are much greater than network RTT. When the sender is application-limited and e.g. only sends small amount of periodic application traffic, where that period is longer than the RTT, measuring the spin bit provides information about the application period, not the network RTT.¶
Simple heuristics based on the observed data rate per flow or changes in the RTT series can be used to reject bad RTT samples due to application or flow control limitation; for example, QoF [TMA-QOF] rejects component RTTs significantly higher than RTTs over the history of the flow. These heuristics may use the handshake RTT as an initial RTT estimate for a given flow.¶
An on-path observer that can see traffic in both directions (from client to server and from server to client) can also use the spin bit to measure “upstream” and “downstream” component RTT; i.e, the component of the end-to-end RTT attributable to the paths between the observer and the server and the observer and the client, respectively. It does this by measuring the delay between a spin edge observed in the upstream direction and that observed in the downstream direction, and vice versa.¶
This document has no actions for IANA.¶
The spin bit is intended to expose end-to-end RTT to observers along the path, so the privacy considerations for the latency spin bit are essentially the same as those for passive RTT measurement in general. It has been shown [PAM-RTT] that RTT measurements do not provide more information for geolocation than is available in the most basic, freely-available IP address based location databases. The risk of exposure of per-flow network RTT to on-path devices is therefore negligible.¶
Nothing yet.¶
This document is derived from [QUIC-SPIN], which was the work of the following authors in addition to the editor of this document:¶
The QUIC Spin Bit was originally specified in a slightly different form by Christian Huitema.¶
This work is partially supported by the European Commission under Horizon 2020 grant agreement no. 688421 Measurement and Architecture for a Middleboxed Internet (MAMI), and by the Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research, and Innovation under contract no. 15.0268. This support does not imply endorsement.¶