draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-04.txt		draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-latest.txt
	HTTP Working Group S. Ludin		HTTP Working Group S. Ludin
	Internet-Draft Akamai		Internet-Draft Akamai
	Intended status: Standards Track M. Nottingham		Intended status: Standards Track M. Nottingham
	Expires: July 27, 2022 Fastly		Expires: October 12, 2024 Fastly
	Y. Wu		Y. Wu
	Cloudflare		Cloudflare
	January 23, 2022		April 10, 2024
	Targeted HTTP Cache Control		Targeted HTTP Cache Control
	draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-04		draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-control-latest
	Abstract		Abstract
	This specification defines a convention for HTTP response header		This specification defines a convention for HTTP response header
	fields that allow cache directives to be targeted at specific caches		fields that allow cache directives to be targeted at specific caches
	or classes of caches. It also defines one such header field,		or classes of caches. It also defines one such header field, the
	targeted at Content Delivery Network (CDN) caches.		CDN-Cache-Control response header field, which is targeted at content
			delivery network (CDN) caches.
	About This Document		About This Document
	This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.		This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
	Status information for this document may be found at		Status information for this document may be found at
	<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-		<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-targeted-cache-
	control/>.		control/>.
	Discussion of this document takes place on the HTTP Working Group		Discussion of this document takes place on the HTTP Working Group
	skipping to change at page 2, line 7 ¶		skipping to change at page 2, line 7 ¶
	Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering		Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
	Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute		Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
	working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-		working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
	Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.		Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
	Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months		Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
	and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any		and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
	time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference		time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
	material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."		material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
	This Internet-Draft will expire on July 27, 2022.		This Internet-Draft will expire on October 12, 2024.
	Copyright Notice		Copyright Notice
	Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the		Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
	document authors. All rights reserved.		document authors. All rights reserved.
	This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal		This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
	Provisions Relating to IETF Documents		Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
	(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of		(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
	publication of this document. Please review these documents		publication of this document. Please review these documents
	carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect		carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
	to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must		to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
	include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of		include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
	the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as		the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
	described in the Simplified BSD License.		described in the Simplified BSD License.
	Table of Contents		Table of Contents
	1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2		1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
	1.1. Notational Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3		1.1. Notational Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
	2. Targeted Cache-Control Header Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . 3		2. Targeted Cache-Control Header Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
	2.1. Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4		2.1. Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
	2.2. Cache Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5		2.2. Cache Behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
	2.3. Interaction with HTTP Freshness . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6		2.3. Interaction with HTTP Freshness . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
	2.4. Defining Targeted Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7		2.4. Defining Targeted Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
	3. The CDN-Cache-Control Targeted Field . . . . . . . . . . . . 7		3. The CDN-Cache-Control Targeted Field . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
	3.1. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7		3.1. Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
	4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8		4. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
	5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8		5. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
	6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8		6. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
	6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8		6.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
	6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9		6.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
	Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9		Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
	1. Introduction		1. Introduction
	Modern deployments of HTTP often use multiple layers of caching. For		Modern deployments of HTTP often use multiple layers of caching. For
	example, a website might use a cache on the origin server itself; it		example, a website might use a cache on the origin server itself; it
	might deploy a caching layer in the same network as the origin		might deploy a caching layer in the same network as the origin
	server, it might use one or more Content Delivery Networks (CDNs)		server, it might use one or more CDNs that are distributed throughout
	that are distributed throughout the Internet, and it might benefit		the Internet, and it might benefit from browser caching as well.
	from browser caching as well.
	Because it is often desirable to control these different classes of		Because it is often desirable to control these different classes of
	caches separately, some means of targeting cache directives at them		caches separately, some means of targeting cache directives at them
	is necessary. For example, if a publisher has a mechanism to		is necessary. For example, if a publisher has a mechanism to
	invalidate the contents of a cache that it has a relationship with		invalidate the contents of a cache that it has a relationship with
	(such as a CDN cache), they might be more comfortable assigning a		(such as a CDN cache), they might be more comfortable assigning a
	more generous caching policy to it, while still wanting to restrict		more generous caching policy to it while still wanting to restrict
	the behavior of other caches.		the behavior of other caches.
	The HTTP Cache-Control response header field (defined in Section 5.2		The HTTP Cache-Control response header field (defined in Section 5.2
	of [HTTP-CACHING]) is widely used to direct caching behavior.		of [HTTP-CACHING]) is widely used to direct caching behavior.
	However, it is relatively undifferentiated; while some cache		However, it is relatively undifferentiated; while some cache
	directives (e.g., s-maxage) are targeted at a specific class of		directives (e.g., s-maxage) are targeted at a specific class of
	caches (for s-maxage, shared caches), targeting is not consistently		caches (for s-maxage, shared caches), targeting is not consistently
	available across all existing cache directives (e.g., stale-while-		available across all existing cache directives (e.g., stale-while-
	revalidate). This is problematic, especially as the number of		revalidate). This is problematic especially as the number of caching
	caching extensions grows, along with the number of potential targets.		extensions grows along with the number of potential targets.
	Some implementations have defined ad hoc control mechanisms to		Some implementations have defined ad hoc control mechanisms to
	overcome this issue, but their interoperability is low. Section 2		overcome this issue, but their interoperability is low. Section 2
	defines a standard framework for targeted cache control using HTTP		defines a standard framework for targeted cache control using HTTP
	response headers, and Section 3 defines one such header: the CDN-		response headers, and Section 3 defines one such header: the CDN-
	Cache-Control response header field.		Cache-Control response header field.
	1.1. Notational Conventions		1.1. Notational Conventions
	The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",		The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
	"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and		"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
	"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP		"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
	14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all		BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
	capitals, as shown here.		capitals, as shown here.
	2. Targeted Cache-Control Header Fields		2. Targeted Cache-Control Header Fields
	A Targeted Cache-Control Header Field (hereafter, "targeted field")		A Targeted Cache-Control Header Field (hereafter "targeted field") is
	is an HTTP response header field that has the same semantics as the		an HTTP response header field that has the same semantics as the
	Cache-Control response header field ([HTTP-CACHING], Section 5.2).		Cache-Control response header field ([HTTP-CACHING], Section 5.2).
	However, it has a distinct field name that indicates the target for		However, it has a distinct field name that indicates the target for
	its cache directives.		its cache directives.
	For example:		For example:
	CDN-Cache-Control: max-age=60		CDN-Cache-Control: max-age=60
	is a targeted field that applies to Content Delivery Networks (CDNs),		is a targeted field that applies to CDNs, as defined in Section 3.
	as defined in Section 3.
	2.1. Syntax		2.1. Syntax
	Targeted fields are Dictionary Structured Fields (Section 3.2 of		Targeted fields are Dictionary Structured Fields (Section 3.2 of
	[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]). Each member of the dictionary is an HTTP cache		[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]). Each member of the Dictionary is an HTTP cache
	response directive (Section 5.2.2 of [HTTP-CACHING]) including		response directive (Section 5.2.2 of [HTTP-CACHING]) including
	extension response directives (as per Section 5.2.3 of		extension response directives (as per Section 5.2.3 of
	[HTTP-CACHING]). Note that while targeted fields often have the same		[HTTP-CACHING]). Note that while targeted fields often have the same
	syntax as Cache-Control fields, differences in error handling mean		syntax as Cache-Control fields, differences in error handling mean
	that using a Cache-Control parser rather than a Structured Fields		that using a Cache-Control parser rather than a Structured Fields
	parser can introduce interoperability issues.		parser can introduce interoperability issues.
	Because cache directives are not defined in terms of structured data		Because cache directives are not defined in terms of structured data
	types, it is necessary to map their values into the appropriate		types, it is necessary to map their values into the appropriate
	types. Section 5.2 of [HTTP-CACHING] defines cache directive values		types. Section 5.2 of [HTTP-CACHING] defines cache directive values
	to be either absent, a quoted-string, or a token.		to be either absent, a quoted-string, or a token.
	This means that cache directives that have no value will be mapped to		This means that cache directives that have no value will be mapped to
	a Boolean (Section 3.3.6 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]). When the value is		a Boolean (Section 3.3.6 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]). When the value is
	a quoted-string, it will be mapped to a String (Section 3.3.3 of		a quoted-string, it will be mapped to a String (Section 3.3.3 of
	[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]), and when it is a token, it will map to a Token		[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]), and when it is a token, it will map to a Token
	(Section 3.3.4 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]), an Integer (Section 3.3.1 of		(Section 3.3.4 of [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]), an Integer (Section 3.3.1 of
	[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]) or a Decimal (Section 3.3.2 of		[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]), or a Decimal (Section 3.3.2 of
	[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]), depending on the content of the value.		[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]), depending on the content of the value.
	For example, the max-age directive (Section 5.2.2.1 of		For example, the max-age directive (Section 5.2.2.1 of
	[HTTP-CACHING]) has an integer value; no-store (Section 5.2.2.5 of		[HTTP-CACHING]) has an integer value; no-store (Section 5.2.2.5 of
	[HTTP-CACHING]) always has a boolean true value, and no-cache		[HTTP-CACHING]) always has a Boolean true value, and no-cache
	(Section 5.2.2.4 of [HTTP-CACHING]) has a value that can either be		(Section 5.2.2.4 of [HTTP-CACHING]) has a value that can be either
	boolean true or a string containing a comma-delimited list of field		Boolean true or a string containing a comma-delimited list of field
	names.		names.
	Implementations MUST NOT generate values that violate these inferred		Implementations MUST NOT generate values that violate these inferred
	constraints on the cache directive's value. In particular, string		constraints on the cache directive's value. In particular, string
	values whose first character is not alphabetic or "*" MUST be		values whose first character is not alphabetic or "*" MUST be
	generated as structured Strings, so they are not mistaken for other		generated as Strings so that they are not mistaken for other types.
	types.
	Implementations SHOULD NOT consume values that violate these inferred		Implementations SHOULD NOT consume values that violate these inferred
	constraints. For example, a consuming implementation that coerces a		constraints. For example, a consuming implementation that coerces a
	max-age with a decimal value into an integer would behave differently		max-age with a decimal value into an integer would behave differently
	than other implementations, potentially causing interoperability		than other implementations, potentially causing interoperability
	issues.		issues.
	Parameters received on cache directives are to be ignored, unless		Parameters received on cache directives are to be ignored, unless
	other handling is explicitly specified.		other handling is explicitly specified.
	If a targeted field in a given response is empty, or a parsing error		If a targeted field in a given response is empty, or a parsing error
	is encountered, that field MUST be ignored by the cache (i.e., it		is encountered, that field MUST be ignored by the cache (i.e., it
	behaves as if the field were not present, likely falling back to		behaves as if the field were not present, likely falling back to
	other cache-control mechanisms present).		other cache-control mechanisms present).
	2.2. Cache Behavior		2.2. Cache Behavior
	A cache that implements this specification maintains a _target list_		A cache that implements this specification maintains a target list.
	- an ordered list of the targeted field names that it uses for		A target list is an ordered list of the targeted field names that it
	caching policy, with the order reflecting priority from most		uses for caching policy, with the order reflecting priority from most
	applicable to least. The target list might be fixed, user-		applicable to least. The target list might be fixed, user
	configurable, or generated per request, depending upon the		configurable, or generated per request, depending upon the
	implementation.		implementation.
	For example, a CDN cache might support both CDN-Cache-Control and a		For example, a CDN cache might support both CDN-Cache-Control and a
	header specific to that CDN, ExampleCDN-Cache-Control, with the		header specific to that CDN, ExampleCDN-Cache-Control, with the
	latter overriding the former. Its target list would be:		latter overriding the former. Its target list would be:
	[ExampleCDN-Cache-Control, CDN-Cache-Control]		[ExampleCDN-Cache-Control, CDN-Cache-Control]
	When a cache that implements this specification receives a response		When a cache that implements this specification receives a response
	with one or more of the header field names on its target list, the		with one or more of the header field names on its target list, the
	cache MUST select the first (in target list order) field with a		cache MUST select the first (in target-list order) field with a
	valid, non-empty value and use its value to determine the caching		valid, non-empty value and use its value to determine the caching
	policy for the response, and MUST ignore the Cache-Control and		policy for the response, and it MUST ignore the Cache-Control and
	Expires header fields in that response, unless no valid, non-empty		Expires header fields in that response, unless no valid, non-empty
	value is available from the listed header fields.		value is available from the listed header fields.
	Note that this occurs on a response-by-response basis; if no member		Note that this occurs on a response-by-response basis; if no member
	of the cache's target list is present, valid and non-empty, a cache		of the cache's target list is present, valid, and non-empty, a cache
	falls back to other cache control mechanisms as required by HTTP		falls back to other cache control mechanisms as required by HTTP
	[HTTP-CACHING].		[HTTP-CACHING].
	Targeted fields that are not on a cache's target list MUST NOT change		Targeted fields that are not on a cache's target list MUST NOT change
	that cache's behaviour, and MUST be passed through.		that cache's behavior and MUST be passed through.
	Caches that use a targeted field MUST implement the semantics of the		Caches that use a targeted field MUST implement the semantics of the
	following cache directives:		following cache directives:
	o max-age		o max-age
	o must-revalidate		o must-revalidate
	o no-store		o no-store
	skipping to change at page 6, line 4 ¶		skipping to change at page 5, line 48 ¶
	o max-age		o max-age
	o must-revalidate		o must-revalidate
	o no-store		o no-store
	o no-cache		o no-cache
	o private		o private
	Furthermore, they SHOULD implement other cache directives (including		Furthermore, they SHOULD implement other cache directives (including
	extension cache directives) that they support in the Cache-Control		extension cache directives) that they support in the Cache-Control
	response header field.		response header field.
	The semantics and precedence of cache directives in a targeted field		The semantics and precedence of cache directives in a targeted field
	are the same as those in Cache-Control. In particular, no-store and		are the same as those in Cache-Control. In particular, no-store and
	no-cache make max-age inoperative, and unrecognised extension		no-cache make max-age inoperative, and unrecognized extension
	directives are ignored.		directives are ignored.
	2.3. Interaction with HTTP Freshness		2.3. Interaction with HTTP Freshness
	HTTP caching has a single, end-to-end freshness model defined in		HTTP caching has a single, end-to-end freshness model defined in
	Section 4.2 of [HTTP-CACHING]. When additional freshness mechanisms		Section 4.2 of [HTTP-CACHING]. When additional freshness mechanisms
	are only available to some caches along a request path (for example,		are only available to some caches along a request path (for example,
	using targeted fields), their interactions need to be carefully		using targeted fields), their interactions need to be carefully
	considered. In particular, a targeted cache might have longer		considered. In particular, a targeted cache might have longer
	freshness lifetimes available to it than other caches, causing it to		freshness lifetimes available to it than other caches, causing it to
	skipping to change at page 6, line 32 ¶		skipping to change at page 6, line 29 ¶
	stale to those other caches, negatively impacting cache efficiency.		stale to those other caches, negatively impacting cache efficiency.
	For example, a response stored by a CDN cache might be served with		For example, a response stored by a CDN cache might be served with
	the following headers:		the following headers:
	Age: 1800		Age: 1800
	Cache-Control: max-age=600		Cache-Control: max-age=600
	CDN-Cache-Control: max-age=3600		CDN-Cache-Control: max-age=3600
	From the CDN's perspective, this response is still fresh after being		From the CDN's perspective, this response is still fresh after being
	cached for 30 minutes, while from other caches' standpoint, this		cached for 30 minutes, while from the standpoint of other caches,
	response is already stale. See [AGE-PENALTY] for more discussion.		this response is already stale. See [AGE-PENALTY] for more
			discussion.
	When the targeted cache has a strong coherence mechanism (e.g., the		When the targeted cache has a strong coherence mechanism (e.g., the
	origin server has the ability to proactively invalidate cached		origin server has the ability to proactively invalidate cached
	responses), it is often desirable to mitigate these effects. Some		responses), it is often desirable to mitigate these effects. Some
	techniques seen in deployments include:		techniques seen in deployments include:
	o Removing the Age header field		o Removing the Age header field
	o Updating the Date header field value to the current time		o Updating the Date header field value to the current time
	o Updating the Expires header field value to the current time, plus		o Updating the Expires header field value to the current time, plus
	any Cache-Control: max-age value		any Cache-Control: max-age value
	This specification does not place any specific requirements on		This specification does not place any specific requirements on
	implementations to mitigate these effects, but definitions of		implementations to mitigate these effects, but definitions of
	targeted fields can do so.		targeted fields can do so.
	2.4. Defining Targeted Fields		2.4. Defining Targeted Fields
	A targeted field for a particular class of cache can be defined by		A targeted field for a particular class of cache can be defined by
	requesting registration in the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)		requesting registration in the "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)
	Field Name Registry (<https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-		Field Name Registry" (<https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-
	fields/>).		fields/>).
	Registration requests can use this document as the specification		Registration requests can use this document as the specification
	document, in which case the Comments field should clearly define the		document; in which case, the Comments field should clearly define the
	class of caches that the targeted field applies to. Alternatively,		class of caches that the targeted field applies to. Alternatively,
	if other documentation for the field has been created, it can be used		if other documentation for the field has been created, it can be used
	as the specification document.		as the specification document.
	By convention, targeted fields have the suffix "-Cache-Control":		By convention, targeted fields have the suffix "-Cache-Control",
	e.g., "ExampleCDN-Cache-Control". However, this suffix MUST NOT be		e.g., "ExampleCDN-Cache-Control". However, this suffix MUST NOT be
	used on its own to identify targeted fields; it is only a convention.		used on its own to identify targeted fields; it is only a convention.
	3. The CDN-Cache-Control Targeted Field		3. The CDN-Cache-Control Targeted Field
	The CDN-Cache-Control response header field is a targeted field		The CDN-Cache-Control response header field is a targeted field
	(Section 2) that allows origin servers to control the behaviour of		(Section 2) that allows origin servers to control the behavior of CDN
	CDN caches interposed between them and clients, separately from other		caches interposed between them and clients separately from other
	caches that might handle the response.		caches that might handle the response.
	It applies to caches that are part of a distributed network that		It applies to caches that are part of a distributed network that
	operate on behalf of an origin server (commonly called a Content		operate on behalf of an origin server (commonly called a CDN).
	Delivery Network or CDN).
	CDN caches that use CDN-Cache-Control will typically forward this		CDN caches that use CDN-Cache-Control will typically forward this
	header so that downstream CDN caches can use it as well. However,		header so that downstream CDN caches can use it as well. However,
	they MAY remove it when this is undesirable (for example, when		they MAY remove it when this is undesirable (for example, when
	configured to do so because it is known not to be used downstream).		configured to do so because it is known not to be used downstream).
	3.1. Examples		3.1. Examples
	For example, the following header fields would instruct a CDN cache		For example, the following header fields would instruct a CDN cache
	(i.e., a cache with a target list of "[CDN-Cache-Control]") to		(i.e., a cache with a target list of "[CDN-Cache-Control]") to
	skipping to change at page 8, line 19 ¶		skipping to change at page 8, line 19 ¶
	prevent all caches from storing the response:		prevent all caches from storing the response:
	Cache-Control: no-store		Cache-Control: no-store
	Whereas these would prevent all caches except for CDN caches from		Whereas these would prevent all caches except for CDN caches from
	storing the response:		storing the response:
	Cache-Control: no-store		Cache-Control: no-store
	CDN-Cache-Control: none		CDN-Cache-Control: none
	(note that 'none' is not a registered cache directive; it is here to		(Note that 'none' is not a registered cache directive; it is here to
	avoid sending a header field with an empty value, which would be		avoid sending a header field with an empty value, which would be
	ignored)		ignored.)
	4. IANA Considerations		4. IANA Considerations
	Please register the following entry in the Hypertext Transfer		IANA has registered the following entry in the "Hypertext Transfer
	Protocol (HTTP) Field Name Registry defined by [HTTP]:		Protocol (HTTP) Field Name Registry" defined by [HTTP]:
	o Field Name: CDN-Cache-Control		Field Name: CDN-Cache-Control
	o Status: permanent		Status: permanent
	o Specification Document: [this document]		Specification Document: RFC 9213
	o Comments: Cache directives targeted at Content Delivery Networks		Comments: Cache directives targeted at content delivery networks
	5. Security Considerations		5. Security Considerations
	The security considerations of HTTP caching [HTTP-CACHING] apply.		The security considerations of HTTP caching [HTTP-CACHING] apply.
	The ability to carry multiple caching policies on a response can		The ability to carry multiple caching policies on a response can
	result in confusion about how a response will be cached in different		result in confusion about how a response will be cached in different
	systems, potentially resulting in unintentional reuse of responses		systems, potentially resulting in unintentional reuse of responses
	with sensitive information. For this reason, care must be exercised.		with sensitive information. For this reason, care must be exercised.
	6. References		6. References
	6.1. Normative References		6.1. Normative References
	[HTTP] Fielding, R. T., Nottingham, M., and J. Reschke, "HTTP		[HTTP] Fielding, R., Nottingham, M., and J. Reschke, "HTTP
	Semantics", draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19 (work in		Semantics", draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-19 (work in
	progress), September 2021.		progress), September 2021.
	[HTTP-CACHING]		[HTTP-CACHING]
	Fielding, R. T., Nottingham, M., and J. Reschke, "HTTP		Fielding, R., Nottingham, M., and J. Reschke, "HTTP
	Caching", draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-19 (work in progress),		Caching", draft-ietf-httpbis-cache-19 (work in progress),
	September 2021.		September 2021.
	[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate		[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
	Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,		Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
	DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,		DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
	<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.		<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
	[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC		[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
	2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,		2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
	May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.		May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
	[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]		[STRUCTURED-FIELDS]
	Nottingham, M. and P-H. Kamp, "Structured Field Values for		Nottingham, M. and P. Kamp, "Structured Field Values for
	HTTP", RFC 8941, DOI 10.17487/RFC8941, February 2021,		HTTP", RFC 8941, DOI 10.17487/RFC8941, February 2021,
	<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8941>.		<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8941>.
	6.2. Informative References		6.2. Informative References
	[AGE-PENALTY]		[AGE-PENALTY]
	Cohen, E. and H. Kaplan, "The age penalty and its effect		Cohen, E. and H. Kaplan, "The age penalty and its effect
	on cache performance", March 2001,		on cache performance", March 2001,
	<https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1251440.1251447>.		<https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1251440.1251447>.
End of changes. 40 change blocks.
	57 lines changed or deleted		56 lines changed or added
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/