HTTPbis Working Group | R. Peon |
Internet-Draft | Google, Inc |
Intended status: Informational | H. Ruellan |
Expires: December 27, 2013 | Canon CRF |
June 25, 2013 |
This document describes a format adapted to efficiently represent HTTP headers in the context of HTTP/2.0.¶
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress”.¶
This Internet-Draft will expire on December 27, 2013.¶
Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.¶
This document describes a format adapted to efficiently represent HTTP headers in the context of HTTP/2.0.¶
In HTTP/1.X, HTTP headers, which are necessary for the functioning of the protocol, are transmitted with no transformations. Unfortunately, the amount of redundancy in both the keys and the values of these headers is astonishingly high, and is the cause of increased latency on lower bandwidth links. This indicates that an alternate encoding for headers would be beneficial to latency, and that is what is proposed here. As shown by SPDY [SPDY], Deflate compresses HTTP very effectively. However, the use of a compression scheme which allows for arbitrary matches against the previously encoded data (such as Deflate) exposes users to security issues. In particular, the compression of sensitive data, together with other data controlled by an attacker, may lead to leakage of that sensitive data, even when the resultant bytes are transmitted over an encrypted channel. Another consideration is that processing and memory costs of a compressor such as Deflate may also be too high for some classes of devices, for example when doing forward or reverse proxying.¶
The HTTP header representation described in this document is based on indexing tables that store (name, value) pairs, called header tables in the remainder of this document. This scheme is believed to be safe for all known attacks against the compression context today. Header tables are incrementally updated during the whole HTTP/2.0 session. Two independent header tables are used during a HTTP/2.0 session, one for HTTP request headers and one for HTTP response headers.¶
The encoder is responsible for deciding which headers to insert as (name, value) pairs in the header table. The decoder then does exactly what the encoder prescribes, ending in a state that exactly matches the encoder's state. This enables decoders to remain simple and understand a wide variety of encoders.¶
A header may be represented as a literal or as an index. If represented as a literal, the representation specifies whether this header is used to update the indexing table. The different representations are described in Section 3.3.¶
A set of headers is coded as a difference from the previous set of headers.¶
An example illustrating the use these different mechanisms to represent headers is available in Appendix B.¶
The encoding and decoding of headers relies on a few components. First, a header table (see Section 3.2) is used to associate headers to index values. Second, a set of headers is encoded as a difference from the previous reference set of headers (see Section 3.4).¶
As messages are exchanged in two directions, from client to server and from server to client, there are two sets of components: one for each direction. All the headers sent in messages from the client to the server are encoded (and decoded) using one set of components. All the headers sent in messages from the server to the client (including headers contained in PUSH_PROMISE frame) are encoded using the other set of compotents.¶
A header table consists of an ordered list of (name, value) pairs. A pair is either inserted at the end of the table or replaces an existing pair depending on the chosen representation. A pair can be represented as an index which is its position in the table, starting with 0 for the first entry.¶
Header names are always represented as lower-case strings. An input header name matches the header name of a (name, value) pair stored in the Header Table if they are equal using a character-based, case insensitive comparison. An input header value matches the header value of a (name, value) pair stored in the Header Table if they are equal using a character-based, case sensitive comparison. An input header (name, value) pair matches a pair in the Header Table if both the name and value are matching as per above.¶
The header table is progressively updated based on headers represented as literal (as defined in Section 3.3.1). Two update mechanisms are defined: ¶
Incremental and substitution indexing are optional. If none of them is selected in a header representation, the header table is not updated. In particular, no update happens on the header table when processing an indexed representation.
The header table size can be bounded so as to limit the memory requirements (see the SETTINGS_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE in Section 5). The header table size is defined as the sum of the size of each entry of the table. The size of an entry is the sum of the length in bytes (as defined in Section 4.2.2) of its name, of value's length in bytes and of 32 bytes (for accounting for the entry structure overhead).¶
When an entry is added to the header table, if the header table size is greater than the limit, the table size is reduced by dropping the entries at the beginning of the table until the header table size becomes lower than or equal to the limit. Dropping entries from the beginning of the table causes a renumbering of the remaining entries. [rfc.comment.1: Feedback is needed on this automatic eviction strategy.] ¶
To optimize the representation of the headers exchanged at the beginning of an HTTP/2.0 session, the header table is initialized with common headers. Two lists of initial headers are provided in Appendix A. One is for messages sent from a client to a server, the other is for messages sent from a server to a client.¶
The literal representation defines a new header. A literal header is represented as: ¶
The indexed representation defines a header as a match to a (name, value) pair in the header table. An indexed header is represented as: ¶
A set of headers is encoded as a difference from the previous reference set of headers. The initial reference set of headers is the empty set.¶
An indexed representation toggles the presence of the header in the current set of headers. If the header corresponding to the indexed representation was not in the set, it is added to the set. If the header index was in the set, it is removed from it.¶
A literal representation adds a header to the current set of headers if the header is added to the header table (either by incremental indexing or by substitution indexing).¶
To ensure a correct decoding of a set of headers, the following steps or equivalent ones MUST be executed by the decoder.¶
First, upon starting the decoding of a new set of headers, the reference set of headers is interpreted into the working set of headers: for each header in the reference set, an entry is added to the working set, containing the header name, its value, and its current index in the header table.¶
Then, the header representations are processed in their order of occurrence in the frame.¶
For an indexed representation, the decoder checks whether the index is present in the working set. If true, the corresponding entry is removed from the working set. If several entries correspond to this encoded index, all these entries are removed from the working set. If the index is not present in the working set, it is used to retrieve the corresponding header from the header table, and a new entry is added to the working set representing this header.¶
For a literal representation, a new entry is added to the working set representing this header. If the literal representation specifies that the header is to be indexed, the header is added accordingly to the header table, and its index is included in the entry in the working set. Otherwise, the entry in the working set contains an undefined index.¶
When all the header representations have been processed, the working set contains all the headers of the set of headers.¶
The new reference set of headers is computed by removing from the working set all the headers that are not present in the header table.¶
It should be noted that during the decoding of the header representations, the same index may be associated to different headers in the working set and in the header table.¶
A header block consists of a set of header fields, which are name-value pairs. Each header field is encoded using one of the header representation.¶
Integers are used to represent name indexes, pair indexes or string lengths. The integer representation keeps byte-alignment as much as possible as this allows various processing optimizations as well as efficient use of DEFLATE. For that purpose, an integer representation always finishes at the end of a byte.¶
An integer is represented in two parts: a prefix that fills the current byte and an optional list of bytes that are used if the integer value does not fit in the prefix. The number of bits of the prefix (called N) is a parameter of the integer representation.¶
The N-bit prefix allows filling the current byte. If the value is small enough (strictly less than 2^N-1), it is encoded within the N-bit prefix. Otherwise all the bits of the prefix are set to 1 and the value is encoded using an unsigned variable length integer representation.¶
The algorithm to represent an integer I is as follows: ¶
The value 10 is to be encoded with a 5-bit prefix. ¶
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ | X | X | X | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10 stored on 5 bits +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
The value I=1337 is to be encoded with a 5-bit prefix. ¶
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ | X | X | X | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Prefix = 31 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Q>=1, R=26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Q=0 , R=10 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
Literal strings can represent header names or header values. They are encoded in two parts: ¶
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ | 1 | Index (7+) | +---+---------------------------+
This representation starts with the '1' 1-bit prefix, followed by the index of the matching pair, represented as an integer with a 7-bit prefix.¶
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ | 0 | 1 | 1 | Index (5+) | +---+---+---+-------------------+
This representation, which does not involve updating the header table, starts with the '011' 3-bit pattern.¶
If the header name matches the header name of a (name, value) pair stored in the Header Table, the index of the pair increased by one (index + 1) is represented as an integer with a 5-bit prefix. Note that if the index is strictly below 31, one byte is used.¶
If the header name does not match a header name entry, the value 0 is represented on 5 bits followed by the header name, represented as a literal string.¶
Header name representation is followed by the header value represented as a literal string as described in Section 4.2.2.¶
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ | 0 | 1 | 0 | Index (5+) | +---+---+---+-------------------+
This representation starts with the '010' 3-bit pattern.¶
If the header name matches the header name of a (name, value) pair stored in the Header Table, the index of the pair increased by one (index + 1) is represented as an integer with a 5-bit prefix. Note that if the index is strictly below 31, one byte is used.¶
If the header name does not match a header name entry, the value 0 is represented on 5 bits followed by the header name, represented as a literal string.¶
Header name representation is followed by the header value represented as a literal string as described in Section 4.2.2.¶
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ | 0 | 0 | Index (6+) | +---+---+-----------------------+
This representation starts with the '00' 2-bit pattern.¶
If the header name matches the header name of a (name, value) pair stored in the Header Table, the index of the pair increased by one (index + 1) is represented as an integer with a 6-bit prefix. Note that if the index is strictly below 62, one byte is used.¶
If the header name does not match a header name entry, the value 0 is represented on 6 bits followed by the header name, represented as a literal string.¶
The index of the substituted (name, value) pair is inserted after the header name representation as a 0-bit prefix integer.¶
This index is followed by the header value represented as a literal string as described in Section 4.2.2.¶
A few parameters can be used to accomodate client and server processing and memory requirements. ¶
TODO?¶
This memo includes no request to IANA.¶
[rfc.comment.4: The tables in this section should be updated based on statistical analysis of header names frequency and specific HTTP 2.0 header rules (like removal of some headers).]
[rfc.comment.5: These tables are not adapted for headers contained in PUSH_PROMISE frames. Either the tables can be merged, or the table for responses can be updated.] ¶
The following table lists the pre-defined headers that make-up the initial header table user to represent requests sent from a client to a server.¶
Index | Header Name | Header Value |
---|---|---|
0 | :scheme | http |
1 | :scheme | https |
2 | :host | |
3 | :path | / |
4 | :method | get |
5 | accept | |
6 | accept-charset | |
7 | accept-encoding | |
8 | accept-language | |
9 | cookie | |
10 | if-modified-since | |
11 | keep-alive | |
12 | user-agent | |
13 | proxy-connection | |
14 | referer | |
15 | accept-datetime | |
16 | authorization | |
17 | allow | |
18 | cache-control | |
19 | connection | |
20 | content-length | |
21 | content-md5 | |
22 | content-type | |
23 | date | |
24 | expect | |
25 | from | |
26 | if-match | |
27 | if-none-match | |
28 | if-range | |
29 | if-unmodified-since | |
30 | max-forwards | |
31 | pragma | |
32 | proxy-authorization | |
33 | range | |
34 | te | |
35 | upgrade | |
36 | via | |
37 | warning |
The following table lists the pre-defined headers that make-up the initial header table used to represent responses sent from a server to a client. The same header table is also used to represent request headers sent from a server to a client in a PUSH_PROMISE frame.¶
Index | Header Name | Header Value |
---|---|---|
0 | :status | 200 |
1 | age | |
2 | cache-control | |
3 | content-length | |
4 | content-type | |
5 | date | |
6 | etag | |
7 | expires | |
8 | last-modified | |
9 | server | |
10 | set-cookie | |
11 | vary | |
12 | via | |
13 | access-control-allow-origin | |
14 | accept-ranges | |
15 | allow | |
16 | connection | |
17 | content-disposition | |
18 | content-encoding | |
19 | content-language | |
20 | content-location | |
21 | content-md5 | |
22 | content-range | |
23 | link | |
24 | location | |
25 | p3p | |
26 | pragma | |
27 | proxy-authenticate | |
28 | refresh | |
29 | retry-after | |
30 | strict-transport-security | |
31 | trailer | |
32 | transfer-encoding | |
33 | warning | |
34 | www-authenticate |
Here is an example that illustrates different representations and how tables are updated. [rfc.comment.6: This section needs to be updated to integrate differential coding.] ¶
The first header set to represent is the following: ¶
:path: /my-example/index.html user-agent: my-user-agent x-my-header: first
The header table is empty, all headers are represented as literal headers with indexing. The 'x-my-header' header name is not in the header name table and is encoded literally. This gives the following representation:
0x44 (literal header with incremental indexing, name index = 3) 0x16 (header value string length = 22) /my-example/index.html 0x4D (literal header with incremental indexing, name index = 12) 0x0D (header value string length = 13) my-user-agent 0x40 (literal header with incremental indexing, new name) 0x0B (header name string length = 11) x-my-header 0x05 (header value string length = 5) first
The header table is as follows after the processing of these headers:
Header table +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | Index | Header Name | Header Value | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 0 | :scheme | http | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 1 | :scheme | https | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | ... | ... | ... | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 37 | warning | | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 38 | :path | /my-example/index.html | added header +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 39 | user-agent | my-user-agent | added header +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 40 | x-my-header | first | added header +---------+----------------+---------------------------+
As all the headers in the first header set are indexed in the header table, all are kept in the reference set of headers, which is:
Reference Set: :path, /my-example/index.html user-agent, my-user-agent x-my-header, first
The second header set to represent is the following: ¶
:path: /my-example/resources/script.js user-agent: my-user-agent x-my-header: second
Comparing this second header set to the reference set, the first and third headers are from the reference set are not present in this second header set and must be removed. In addition, in this new set, the first and third headers have to be encoded. The path header is represented as a literal header with substitution indexing. The x-my-header will be represented as a literal header with incremental indexing.
0xa6 (indexed header, index = 38: removal from reference set) 0xa8 (indexed header, index = 40: removal from reference set) 0x04 (literal header, substitution indexing, name index = 3) 0x26 (replaced entry index = 38) 0x1f (header value string length = 31) /my-example/resources/script.js 0x5f 0x0a (literal header, incremental indexing, name index = 40) 0x06 (header value string length = 6) second
The header table is updated as follow:
Header table +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | Index | Header Name | Header Value | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 0 | :scheme | http | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 1 | :scheme | https | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | ... | ... | ... | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 37 | warning | | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 38 | :path | /my-example/resources/ | replaced | | | script.js | header +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 39 | user-agent | my-user-agent | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 40 | x-my-header | first | +---------+----------------+---------------------------+ | 41 | x-my-header | second | added header +---------+----------------+---------------------------+
All the headers in this second header set are indexed in the header table, therefore, all are kept in the reference set of headers, which becomes:
Reference Set: :path, /my-example/resources/script.js user-agent, my-user-agent x-my-header, second