The Cache-Status HTTP Response Header Field

To aid debugging, HTTP caches often append header fields to a response explaining how they handled the request. This specification codifies that practice and updates it to align with HTTP’s current caching model.¶

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.¶

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.¶

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as “work in progress”.¶

This Internet-Draft will expire on February 6, 2021.¶

Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.¶

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.¶

To aid debugging, HTTP caches often append header fields to a response explaining how they handled the request. Unfortunately, the semantics of these headers are often unclear, and both the semantics and syntax used vary greatly between implementations.¶

This specification defines a single, new HTTP response header field, “Cache-Status” for this purpose.¶

The Cache-Status HTTP response header indicates caches’ handling of the request corresponding to the response it occurs within.¶

Each member of the list represents a cache that has handled the request. The first member of the list represents the cache closest to the origin server, and the last member of the list represents the cache closest to the client (possibly including the user agent’s cache itself, if it chooses to append a value).¶

Caches determine when it is appropriate to add the Cache-Status header field to a response. Some might decide to add it to all responses, whereas others might only do so when specifically configured to, or when the request contains a header that activates a debugging mode.¶

When adding a value to the Cache-Status header field, caches SHOULD preserve the existing contents of the header field, to allow debugging of the entire chain of caches handling the request.¶

Each list member identifies the cache that inserted that value, and MUST be a String or Token. Depending on the deployment, this might be a product or service name (e.g., ExampleCache or “Example CDN”), a hostname (“cache-3.example.com”), and IP address, or a generated string.¶

Each member of the list can also have parameters that describe that cache’s handling of the request. While all of these parameters are OPTIONAL, caches are encouraged to provide as much information as possible.¶

New Cache-Status Parameters can be defined by registering them in the HTTP Cache-Status Parameters registry.¶

Registration requests are reviewed and approved by a Designated Expert, as per [RFC8126], Section 4.5. A specification document is appreciated, but not required.¶

• Community feedback
• If the value is sufficiently well-defined
• Generic parameters are preferred over vendor-specific, application-specific or deployment-specific values. If a generic value cannot be agreed upon in the community, the parameter’s name should be correspondingly specific (e.g., with a prefix that identifies the vendor, application or deployment).

• Name: [a name for the Cache-Status Parameter that matches key]
• Description: [a description of the parameter semantics and value]
• Reference: [to a specification defining this parameter]

See the registry at https://iana.org/assignments/http-cache-status for details on where to send registration requests.¶

Upon publication, please create the HTTP Cache-Status Parameters registry at https://iana.org/assignments/http-cache-status and populate it with the types defined in Section 2; see Section 4 for its associated procedures.¶

Information about a cache’s content can be used to infer the activity of those using it. Generally, access to sensitive information in a cache is limited to those who are authorised to access that information (using a variety of techniques), so this does not represent an attack vector in the general sense.¶

However, if the Cache-Status header field is exposed to parties who are not authorised to obtain the response it occurs within, it could expose information about that data.¶

For example, if an attacker were able to obtain the Cache-Status header field from a response containing sensitive information and access were limited to one person (or limited set of people), they could determine whether that information had been accessed before. This is similar to the information exposed by various timing attacks, but is arguably more reliable, since the cache is directly reporting its state.¶

Mitigations include use of encryption (e.g., TLS [RFC8446])) to protect the response, and careful controls over access to response header fields (as are present in the Web platform). When in doubt, the Cache-Status header field can be omitted.¶