HTTP Working Group                                              T. Pauly
Internet-Draft                                               Apple, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track                            May 10, 2023
Expires: November 11, 2023
            HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter for Next-Hop Aliases
                draft-ietf-httpbis-alias-proxy-status-03
Abstract
   This document defines an HTTP Proxy-Status Parameter that contains a
   list of aliases and canonical names received over DNS when
   establishing a connection to the next hop.
About This Document
   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
   Status information for this document may be found at
   .
   Discussion of this document takes place on the HTTP Working Group
   mailing list (), which is archived at
   .  Working Group
   information can be found at .
   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   .
Status of This Memo
   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
   This Internet-Draft will expire on November 11, 2023.
Pauly                   Expires November 11, 2023               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft          DNS Aliases Proxy-Status                May 2023
Copyright Notice
   Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.
   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
     1.1.  Requirements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   2.  next-hop-aliases Parameter  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.1.  Encoding special characters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   3.  Implementation Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   5.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
1.  Introduction
   The Proxy-Status HTTP response field [PROXY-STATUS] allows proxies to
   convey information about how a proxied request was handled in HTTP
   responses sent to clients.  It defines a set of parameters that
   provide information, such as the name of the next hop.
   [PROXY-STATUS] defines a "next-hop" parameter, which can contain a
   hostname, IP address, or alias of the next hop.  This parameter can
   contain only one such item, so it cannot be used to communicate a
   chain of aliases encountered during DNS resolution when connecting to
   the next hop.
   Knowing the full chain of names that were used during DNS resolution
   via CNAME records [DNS] is particularly useful for clients of forward
   proxies, in which the client is requesting to connect to a specific
   target hostname using the CONNECT method [HTTP] or UDP proxying
   [CONNECT-UDP].  CNAME records can be used to "cloak" hosts that
   perform tracking or malicious activity behind more innocuous
Pauly                   Expires November 11, 2023               [Page 2]
Internet-Draft          DNS Aliases Proxy-Status                May 2023
   hostnames, and clients such as web browsers use the chain of DNS
   names to influence behavior like cookie usage policies [COOKIES] or
   blocking of malicious hosts.
   This document allows clients to receive the CNAME chain of DNS names
   for the next hop by including the list of names in a new "next-hop-
   aliases" Proxy-Status parameter.
1.1.  Requirements
   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.
2.  next-hop-aliases Parameter
   The "next-hop-aliases" parameter's value is a String
   [STRUCTURED-FIELDS] that contains one or more DNS names in a comma-
   separated list.  The items in the list include all alias names an
   canonical names received in CNAME records [DNS] during the course of
   resolving the next hop's hostname using DNS, not including the
   original requested hostname itself.  The names SHOULD appear in the
   order in which they were received in DNS.  If there are multiple
   CNAME records in the chain, the first name in the "next-hop-aliases"
   list would be the value in the CNAME record for the original
   hostname, and the final name in the "next-hop-aliases" list would be
   the name that ultimately resolved to one or more addresses.
   The list of DNS names in "next-hop-aliases" uses a comma (",") as a
   separator between names.  Note that if a comma is included in a name
   itself, the comma must be encoded as described in Section 2.1.
   For example, consider a proxy "proxy.example.net" that receives the
   following records when performing DNS resolution for the next hop
   "host.example.com":
   host.example.com.           CNAME   tracker.example.com.
   tracker.example.com.        CNAME   service1.example-cdn.com.
   service1.example-cdn.com.   AAAA    2001:db8::1
   The proxy could include the following proxy status in its response:
   Proxy-Status: proxy.example.net; next-hop=2001:db8::1;
       next-hop-aliases="tracker.example.com,service1.example-cdn.com"
Pauly                   Expires November 11, 2023               [Page 3]
Internet-Draft          DNS Aliases Proxy-Status                May 2023
   This indicates that proxy.example.net, which used the IP address
   "2001:db8::1" as the next hop for this request, encountered the names
   "tracker.example.com" and "service1.example-cdn.com" in the DNS
   resolution chain.  Note that while this example includes both the
   "next-hop" and "next-hop-aliases" parameters, "next-hop-aliases" can
   be included without including "next-hop".
   The "next-hop-aliases" parameter only applies when DNS was used to
   resolve the next hop's name, and does not apply in all situations.
   Clients can use the information in this parameter to determine how to
   use the connection established through the proxy, but need to
   gracefully handle situations in which this parameter is not present.
   The proxy MAY send the empty string ("") as the value of "next-hop-
   aliases" to indicate that no CNAME records were encountered when
   resolving the next hop's name.
2.1.  Encoding special characters
   DNS names commonly just contain alphanumeric characters and hyphens
   ("-"), although they are allowed to contain any character [RFC1035],
   Section 3.1, including a comma.  To prevent commas or other special
   characters in names leading to incorrect parsing, any characters that
   appear in names in this list that do not belong to the set of URI
   Unreserved Characters [RFC3986], Section 2.3 MUST be percent-encoded
   as defined in [RFC3986], Section 2.1.
   For example, consider the DNS name "name,with,commas.example.com".
   This name would be encoded within a "next-hop-aliases" parameter as
   follows:
Proxy-Status: proxy.example.net; next-hop=2001:db8::1;
    next-hop-aliases="name%2Cwith%2Ccommas.example.com,service1.example-cdn.com"
   It is also possible for a DNS name to include a period character
   (".") within a label, instead of as a label separator.  In this case,
   the period character MUST be first escaped as "\.".  Since the "\"
   character itself will be percent-encoded, the name
   "dot\.label.example.com" would be encoded within a "next-hop-aliases"
   parameter as follows:
Proxy-Status: proxy.example.net; next-hop=2001:db8::1;
    next-hop-aliases="dot%5C.label.example.com,service1.example-cdn.com"
   Upon parsing this name, "dot%5C.label" MUST be treated as a single
   label.
Pauly                   Expires November 11, 2023               [Page 4]
Internet-Draft          DNS Aliases Proxy-Status                May 2023
   Similarly the "\" character in a label MUST be escaped as "\\".
   Other uses of "\" MUST NOT appear in the label after percent-
   decoding.
3.  Implementation Considerations
   In order to include the "next-hop-aliases" parameter, a proxy needs
   to have access to the chain of alias names and canonical names
   received in CNAME records.
   Implementations ought to note that the full chain of names might not
   available in common DNS resolution APIs, such as "getaddrinfo".
   "getaddrinfo" does have an option for "AI_CANONNAME", but this will
   only return the last name in the chain (the canonical name), not the
   alias names.
   An implementation MAY include incomplete information in the "next-
   hop-aliases" parameter to accommodate cases where it is unable to
   include the full chain, such as only including the canonical name if
   the implementation can only use "getaddrinfo" as described above.
4.  Security Considerations
   The "next-hop-aliases" parameter does not include any DNSSEC
   information or imply that DNSSEC was used.  The information included
   in the parameter can only be trusted to be valid insofar as the
   client trusts the proxy to provide accurate information.  This
   information is intended to be used as a hint, and SHOULD NOT be used
   for making security decisions about the identity of a resource
   accessed through the proxy.
   Inspecting CNAME chains can be used to detect cloaking of trackers or
   malicious hosts.  However, the CNAME records could be omitted by a
   recursive or authoritative resolver that is trying to hide this form
   of cloaking.  In particular, recursive or authoritative resolvers can
   omit these records for both clients directly performing DNS name
   resolution and proxies performing DNS name resolution on behalf of
   client.  A malicious proxy could also choose to not report these
   CNAME chains in order to hide the cloaking.  In general, clients can
   trust information included (or not included) in the "next-hop-
   aliases" parameter to the degree that the proxy and any resolvers
   used by the proxy are trusted.
5.  IANA Considerations
   This document registers the "next-hop-aliases" parameter in the "HTTP
   Proxy-Status Parameters" registry <>.
Pauly                   Expires November 11, 2023               [Page 5]
Internet-Draft          DNS Aliases Proxy-Status                May 2023
   Name:  next-hop-aliases
   Description:  A string containing one or more DNS aliases or
      canonical names used to establish a proxied connection to the next
      hop.
   Reference:  This document
6.  References
6.1.  Normative References
   [CONNECT-UDP]
              Schinazi, D., "Proxying UDP in HTTP", RFC 9298,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9298, August 2022,
              .
   [DNS]      Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - concepts and facilities",
              STD 13, RFC 1034, DOI 10.17487/RFC1034, November 1987,
              .
   [HTTP]     Fielding, R., Ed., Nottingham, M., Ed., and J. Reschke,
              Ed., "HTTP Semantics", STD 97, RFC 9110,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC9110, June 2022,
              .
   [PROXY-STATUS]
              Nottingham, M. and P. Sikora, "The Proxy-Status HTTP
              Response Header Field", RFC 9209, DOI 10.17487/RFC9209,
              June 2022, .
   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              .
   [RFC3986]  Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
              Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
              RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005,
              .
   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, .
Pauly                   Expires November 11, 2023               [Page 6]
Internet-Draft          DNS Aliases Proxy-Status                May 2023
   [STRUCTURED-FIELDS]
              Nottingham, M. and P-H. Kamp, "Structured Field Values for
              HTTP", RFC 8941, DOI 10.17487/RFC8941, February 2021,
              .
6.2.  Informative References
   [COOKIES]  Barth, A., "HTTP State Management Mechanism", RFC 6265,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC6265, April 2011,
              .
   [RFC1035]  Mockapetris, P., "Domain names - implementation and
              specification", STD 13, RFC 1035, DOI 10.17487/RFC1035,
              November 1987, .
Author's Address
   Tommy Pauly
   Apple, Inc.
   Email: tpauly@apple.com
Pauly                   Expires November 11, 2023               [Page 7]